Allow the changing of Worksite start dates to avoid penalties and improve quality of data
Currently the only way for you to update the planned work start is to create a revision - which is a bit of a barrier and it takes a few days for the RCA to process. If myWorksites were to accept start date changes (thus changing when the penalties kick in) without you having to go through a revision process it would improve the quality of data around start dates plus help people avoid fees.
HEB Traffic Management Team 12 days ago
Allow the changing of Worksite start dates to avoid penalties and improve quality of data
Currently the only way for you to update the planned work start is to create a revision - which is a bit of a barrier and it takes a few days for the RCA to process. If myWorksites were to accept start date changes (thus changing when the penalties kick in) without you having to go through a revision process it would improve the quality of data around start dates plus help people avoid fees.
HEB Traffic Management Team 12 days ago
Multi-part polygons for worksites
Currently, when creating a worksite, the format is drawing a polygon to cover worksite extents. While this is accurate in showing area for most works, there are occasions where a worksite is covering a ‘package’ of works where the same works are occurring but in several distinct locations. Currently, one would either create a polygon in area A and then start one in area B, however this means there are ‘phantom’ lines across the planning map linking different locations, which then include the clash mitigation etc When entering a traffic management impact, multiple sections of road network can be selected without causing a similar issue, but this option isn’t available at the worksite stage The only alternative would be to create multiple worksites, however this will then cause the issue of multiple charges and administration, and/or worksites which aren’t directly attached to the TMP for their works I’m not sure how the worksite extent is coded, but could the option be added to stop drawing a polygon and then start a new one?
An Anonymous User 2 months ago
Multi-part polygons for worksites
Currently, when creating a worksite, the format is drawing a polygon to cover worksite extents. While this is accurate in showing area for most works, there are occasions where a worksite is covering a ‘package’ of works where the same works are occurring but in several distinct locations. Currently, one would either create a polygon in area A and then start one in area B, however this means there are ‘phantom’ lines across the planning map linking different locations, which then include the clash mitigation etc When entering a traffic management impact, multiple sections of road network can be selected without causing a similar issue, but this option isn’t available at the worksite stage The only alternative would be to create multiple worksites, however this will then cause the issue of multiple charges and administration, and/or worksites which aren’t directly attached to the TMP for their works I’m not sure how the worksite extent is coded, but could the option be added to stop drawing a polygon and then start a new one?
An Anonymous User 2 months ago
Planning Map - RCA Selection
I understand that the selections made on the Planning map filters/tick boxes such as the RCA refresh each time the planning map is re-opened. For my workflow it would be beneficial for these tick box selections to remain for each use of the planning map. This would save missing impacts in the planning map.
kaylie.hazlitt-black@jtoc.govt.nz 3 months ago
Planning Map - RCA Selection
I understand that the selections made on the Planning map filters/tick boxes such as the RCA refresh each time the planning map is re-opened. For my workflow it would be beneficial for these tick box selections to remain for each use of the planning map. This would save missing impacts in the planning map.
kaylie.hazlitt-black@jtoc.govt.nz 3 months ago
Public Impacts Map Improvements
Search function – The Public Impacts Map should allow users to search by street/road name, rather than having to zoom in and locate worksites manually. Public-friendly information – The details displayed when clicking on a worksite need to be easier for the public to understand. If this map is intended for public use, it needs to be easier to understand a public relevant. I suggest adding prompts when worksite information is entered, so the descriptions presented are more user-friendly, and the contractor knows it will be viewed publicly. Who is doing the work – The map should show both the contractor and the organisation they are working for (e.g., “Fulton Hogan on behalf of Timaru District Council” or “Menzies on behalf of Alpine Energy”). This would help the community understand that not all roadworks are Council-led—many are carried out by service providers
katie.ryan 4 months ago
Public Impacts Map Improvements
Search function – The Public Impacts Map should allow users to search by street/road name, rather than having to zoom in and locate worksites manually. Public-friendly information – The details displayed when clicking on a worksite need to be easier for the public to understand. If this map is intended for public use, it needs to be easier to understand a public relevant. I suggest adding prompts when worksite information is entered, so the descriptions presented are more user-friendly, and the contractor knows it will be viewed publicly. Who is doing the work – The map should show both the contractor and the organisation they are working for (e.g., “Fulton Hogan on behalf of Timaru District Council” or “Menzies on behalf of Alpine Energy”). This would help the community understand that not all roadworks are Council-led—many are carried out by service providers
katie.ryan 4 months ago
Access for maintenance work
After work has been completed (WCN issued) some contracts have provisions for maintenance work to be required for a period after the work is completed for reasons other than defect remediation (Example might be weeding after planting). Can / Should we use the same CAR/WAP for network access after completion? Raised by AD @ ASM Possible solutions include have multiple dates / date ranges
George Wills 4 months ago
Access for maintenance work
After work has been completed (WCN issued) some contracts have provisions for maintenance work to be required for a period after the work is completed for reasons other than defect remediation (Example might be weeding after planting). Can / Should we use the same CAR/WAP for network access after completion? Raised by AD @ ASM Possible solutions include have multiple dates / date ranges
George Wills 4 months ago
Report on all work which has happened on a particular street or location
As an RCA we often get requests for details or a list of the works undertaken within a particular street within a date range. (sometimes up to 7 years) When searching within the planning map we have to write a list of TMP or CAR #s and then download the plans individually. It would be good for a link at the bottom of the planning map info that could provide a list of TMP #s and date ranges in excel format to enable quick downloading of the information for processing and filtering. As below, this request has 49 plans or impacts to filter.
George Wills 5 months ago
Report on all work which has happened on a particular street or location
As an RCA we often get requests for details or a list of the works undertaken within a particular street within a date range. (sometimes up to 7 years) When searching within the planning map we have to write a list of TMP or CAR #s and then download the plans individually. It would be good for a link at the bottom of the planning map info that could provide a list of TMP #s and date ranges in excel format to enable quick downloading of the information for processing and filtering. As below, this request has 49 plans or impacts to filter.
George Wills 5 months ago
Planned
Enhancement: Scheduling of Road Space bookings with Real-time Deployments
We are looking to collaborate with the sector around improving the tools for the scheduling of work including real-time deployment of work. How can we can best communicate the activation of roadworks with various stakeholders? Here is what our research has uncovered so far: The public wants to know: When roadworks will be completed (and why they are being done) Whether there are going to be roadworks on their journey today/tomorrow Road controlling authorities want to know: What work is scheduled on the network so that they can help plan and mitigate imminent impacts to transport users. (usually through Advertising, Signals Changes, Public Transport Operations or deferring work) What work is currently on the network so they can manage real-time operations What work was done on the network so they can provide auditing (quality control) for the work Other stakeholders: (emergency services, heavy haulage etc) Want to know if work may impact specific parts of the network that relate to them Roading Contractors want: Flexibility around the timing of their work to better handle their dynamic operational needs. Easy ways to schedule and communicate the deployment of work Simple to use tools that work well while out on the road and in the office Ability for sub contractors to optionally handle scheduling and deployment of work A channel for communicating with the road uses so that they can mitigate risks on their worksites.
George Wills 5 months ago
Planned
Enhancement: Scheduling of Road Space bookings with Real-time Deployments
We are looking to collaborate with the sector around improving the tools for the scheduling of work including real-time deployment of work. How can we can best communicate the activation of roadworks with various stakeholders? Here is what our research has uncovered so far: The public wants to know: When roadworks will be completed (and why they are being done) Whether there are going to be roadworks on their journey today/tomorrow Road controlling authorities want to know: What work is scheduled on the network so that they can help plan and mitigate imminent impacts to transport users. (usually through Advertising, Signals Changes, Public Transport Operations or deferring work) What work is currently on the network so they can manage real-time operations What work was done on the network so they can provide auditing (quality control) for the work Other stakeholders: (emergency services, heavy haulage etc) Want to know if work may impact specific parts of the network that relate to them Roading Contractors want: Flexibility around the timing of their work to better handle their dynamic operational needs. Easy ways to schedule and communicate the deployment of work Simple to use tools that work well while out on the road and in the office Ability for sub contractors to optionally handle scheduling and deployment of work A channel for communicating with the road uses so that they can mitigate risks on their worksites.
George Wills 5 months ago
Use of a Generic TMP on a Site Specific Worksite
Potential Use Case: There is a vertical building project which requires a CAR at a specific location. Traffic Management is only required on an ad-hock basis - such as when trucks are delivering to site. Different TTM companies may provide TTM services throughout the duration of the project each using their own TMP methodology. A TTM company would like to use a Generic TMP for this work. How can myWorksites support this?
George Wills 5 months ago
Use of a Generic TMP on a Site Specific Worksite
Potential Use Case: There is a vertical building project which requires a CAR at a specific location. Traffic Management is only required on an ad-hock basis - such as when trucks are delivering to site. Different TTM companies may provide TTM services throughout the duration of the project each using their own TMP methodology. A TTM company would like to use a Generic TMP for this work. How can myWorksites support this?
George Wills 5 months ago
'Decision Date' Column in Search Export
Feature request to add a 'Declined Date' column to search exports for declined applications. Currently, only 'Submitted Date' is available, causing inconvenience in tracking application timelines accurately. Might pay to expand the request and also display the "Decision Date" on the Worksite/TMP regardless of whether that was a declined or an approved application.
An Anonymous User 6 months ago
'Decision Date' Column in Search Export
Feature request to add a 'Declined Date' column to search exports for declined applications. Currently, only 'Submitted Date' is available, causing inconvenience in tracking application timelines accurately. Might pay to expand the request and also display the "Decision Date" on the Worksite/TMP regardless of whether that was a declined or an approved application.
An Anonymous User 6 months ago
Billing: Improve bill payer controls
Only allow Bill Payer contacts to be set where their Organisation details are complete. ICC reports issues if Bill Payer contacts are added to Worksites, but the Organisation details/address info is incomplete. Suggests we require the Address and Postal Address values before that organisation can have a contact set as the Bill Payer. Allow bill payers to dispute fees.
An Anonymous User 6 months ago
Billing: Improve bill payer controls
Only allow Bill Payer contacts to be set where their Organisation details are complete. ICC reports issues if Bill Payer contacts are added to Worksites, but the Organisation details/address info is incomplete. Suggests we require the Address and Postal Address values before that organisation can have a contact set as the Bill Payer. Allow bill payers to dispute fees.
An Anonymous User 6 months ago
Drag and Drop Functionality for File Uploads in MWS
Feature request to implement drag and drop functionality for file uploads in myWorksites platform to simplify the process and enhance user experience.
An Anonymous User 6 months ago
Drag and Drop Functionality for File Uploads in MWS
Feature request to implement drag and drop functionality for file uploads in myWorksites platform to simplify the process and enhance user experience.
An Anonymous User 6 months ago
Withdraw Applications and Declined Worksites
Feature request to allow users to permanently remove declined and redundant worksite contents. Currently not possible, but in early design phase for implementation. Customer seeking to tidy up past worksites.
An Anonymous User 6 months ago
Withdraw Applications and Declined Worksites
Feature request to allow users to permanently remove declined and redundant worksite contents. Currently not possible, but in early design phase for implementation. Customer seeking to tidy up past worksites.
An Anonymous User 6 months ago
Approval/Decline process for scheduled deployments
Approval/Decline process for scheduled deployments Status on Deployments: ** Requested ** Approved ** Declined ** Cancelled ** Live ** Complete Clash detection on Roadspace bookings Reporting on Deployments / ordered by State highway
An Anonymous User 6 months ago
Approval/Decline process for scheduled deployments
Approval/Decline process for scheduled deployments Status on Deployments: ** Requested ** Approved ** Declined ** Cancelled ** Live ** Complete Clash detection on Roadspace bookings Reporting on Deployments / ordered by State highway
An Anonymous User 6 months ago
Planned
Controlled RFI (Request for further Information)
New functionality for a controlled RFI process within a Worksite or TMP
An Anonymous User 6 months ago
Planned
Controlled RFI (Request for further Information)
New functionality for a controlled RFI process within a Worksite or TMP
An Anonymous User 6 months ago
Completed
Early Access Request Impact Score
Add an automated Impact Score to the end of the EAR submission process, as well as some business logic, to allow applications above a threshold or meeting certain criteria to initiate a review process.
An Anonymous User 6 months ago
Completed
Early Access Request Impact Score
Add an automated Impact Score to the end of the EAR submission process, as well as some business logic, to allow applications above a threshold or meeting certain criteria to initiate a review process.
An Anonymous User 6 months ago
Centralised management for Events
Enable Events to be managed in a single system by enhancing functionality, automation, notifications and being able to easily capture additional data. Problems to overcome: Events are managed across multiple systems (~60% myWorksites, ~40% other), creating inefficiencies and reduced effectiveness. Key challenges faced: Time lost and discrepancies caused from manual and double handling of data across multiple systems. Multiple systems to support the same process creates risk and lacks cohesion for how things are done. Current systems lack desired functionality that would improve ease and efficiency across the Event management processes. Benefits & outcomes sought: This initiative aims to enable the key processes and management for all AT Events on myWorksites, focusing on: +Unified events platform+: Consolidate Events management into a single system for consistency and effectiveness.single system to improve effectiveness for the Events team and related team processes. +Data handling efficiency+: Reduce manual and duplicate data entry by minimizing the number of systems used. +Model & workflow extension+: Extend the myWorksites data model and workflows to fully support Events impacting road space. +Automated notifications+: Leverage data-driven automation to generate timely alerts and communications for Events.
An Anonymous User 8 months ago
Centralised management for Events
Enable Events to be managed in a single system by enhancing functionality, automation, notifications and being able to easily capture additional data. Problems to overcome: Events are managed across multiple systems (~60% myWorksites, ~40% other), creating inefficiencies and reduced effectiveness. Key challenges faced: Time lost and discrepancies caused from manual and double handling of data across multiple systems. Multiple systems to support the same process creates risk and lacks cohesion for how things are done. Current systems lack desired functionality that would improve ease and efficiency across the Event management processes. Benefits & outcomes sought: This initiative aims to enable the key processes and management for all AT Events on myWorksites, focusing on: +Unified events platform+: Consolidate Events management into a single system for consistency and effectiveness.single system to improve effectiveness for the Events team and related team processes. +Data handling efficiency+: Reduce manual and duplicate data entry by minimizing the number of systems used. +Model & workflow extension+: Extend the myWorksites data model and workflows to fully support Events impacting road space. +Automated notifications+: Leverage data-driven automation to generate timely alerts and communications for Events.
An Anonymous User 8 months ago
Full audits, compliance and inspections module
New process for audit, compliance and inspections Improving Road Controlling Authority regulatory functions by optimising audit, compliance and inspection processes for teams in relation to Warranty and Corridor Management processes. Problems to overcome: There are multiple audit, compliance and inspection functions RCA’s must undertake, and these functions are not currently well supported by cohesive tooling. Key challenges faced: Fragmented tooling and processes creates inefficiencies and a lack of oversight to meet regulatory needs. Ineffective tooling relies on manual heavy processes, limiting time available for higher-value work that teams could be doing. Data across different systems limits the ability to have automated insights, meaning inspection efforts are unable to be targeted for maximum efficiency.| Benefits & outcomes sought: This initiative aims to build on existing automation, review and audit functionality and will enable myWorksites to be a comprehensive system, focusing on: Automated inspections: Drive targeted audit, compliance, and inspection activities through automation and data insights. Efficiency gains: Free up team time for higher-value work by reducing manual steps and tool switching. Streamlined workflows: Improve end-to-end audit, compliance, and inspection processes with cohesive tooling. Geotagged evidence: Introduce automated document and photo geolocation tags within new workflows and dashboards.
An Anonymous User 8 months ago
Full audits, compliance and inspections module
New process for audit, compliance and inspections Improving Road Controlling Authority regulatory functions by optimising audit, compliance and inspection processes for teams in relation to Warranty and Corridor Management processes. Problems to overcome: There are multiple audit, compliance and inspection functions RCA’s must undertake, and these functions are not currently well supported by cohesive tooling. Key challenges faced: Fragmented tooling and processes creates inefficiencies and a lack of oversight to meet regulatory needs. Ineffective tooling relies on manual heavy processes, limiting time available for higher-value work that teams could be doing. Data across different systems limits the ability to have automated insights, meaning inspection efforts are unable to be targeted for maximum efficiency.| Benefits & outcomes sought: This initiative aims to build on existing automation, review and audit functionality and will enable myWorksites to be a comprehensive system, focusing on: Automated inspections: Drive targeted audit, compliance, and inspection activities through automation and data insights. Efficiency gains: Free up team time for higher-value work by reducing manual steps and tool switching. Streamlined workflows: Improve end-to-end audit, compliance, and inspection processes with cohesive tooling. Geotagged evidence: Introduce automated document and photo geolocation tags within new workflows and dashboards.
An Anonymous User 8 months ago
More than two detours per layout
Customer requests being able to have more than two detours per layout. Suggests a min. of four being allowed.
An Anonymous User 8 months ago
More than two detours per layout
Customer requests being able to have more than two detours per layout. Suggests a min. of four being allowed.
An Anonymous User 8 months ago
Request for Secondary RCA Approval Stamp on TMP PDF
Feature request to add a visible stamp or indication for secondary RCA approval on downloaded TMP PDFs. Currently, only primary RCA approval is displayed on final approved documents.
An Anonymous User 8 months ago
Request for Secondary RCA Approval Stamp on TMP PDF
Feature request to add a visible stamp or indication for secondary RCA approval on downloaded TMP PDFs. Currently, only primary RCA approval is displayed on final approved documents.
An Anonymous User 8 months ago